Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Links certainly one of mate identity trait resemblance, relationship onset, matchmaking high quality, and you will love lovingwomen.org gГҐ Г¶ver till denna webbplats. [ Website links ]

Baxter, L. A beneficial., & West, L. (2003). Few attitudes of their parallels and you can differences: An excellent dialectical position. Journal out of Private and you can Societal Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Hyperlinks ]

Berscheid, Elizabeth. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and emotion. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible dating (pp. 143-161). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, E., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and matchmaking solutions: An examination of your own coordinating hypothesis. Log away from Fresh Public Psychology, 7, 173-189. [ Website links ]

Record out of Personal and private Relationships, 24, 479-496

Berscheid, Age., & Regan, P. (2005). The fresh new therapy out of interpersonal dating. Higher Seat River, NJ: Pearson Degree (Prentice Hall). [ Website links ]

Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity abilities and you can attributional correspondence since determinants regarding social destination. Speech Monographs, 40, 280-286. [ Website links ]

Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Destination and you can intimate dating. During the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The brand new manual out of social therapy (Vol. dos, last ed. Pp. 193-281). Ny: McGraw-Slope. [ Website links ]

Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, May eleven). You.S. Patent six,735,568. Arizona, DC. [ Links ]

Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, Letter. C. (2008, Late. 18). U.S. Patent eight,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Hyperlinks ]

Buss, D. Meters. (1984). Relationship assortment having personality dispositions: Investigations with around three additional data sources. Behavior Genes, 14, 111-123. [ Website links ]

Byrne, D., & Rhamey, R. (1965). Magnitude out-of positive and negative reinforcements since an effective determinant out-of appeal. Log from Identification and you may Social Psychology, dos, 884-889. [ Links ]

Carter, S. Roentgen. (2005, Feb.), For modern-date Cupids, analysis replaces relationships: Emotional technology are trailing the fresh new effective fits generated in the eHarmony. Organization getting Psychological Technology Observer, 18. Installed out of [ Hyperlinks ]

Carter, S. Roentgen., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Improving partner solutions through the internet: An assessment off relationships high quality ranging from marriage ceremonies due to an online dating program and you may marriages as a result of unfettered choice. Interpersona: A major international Diary towards Private Matchmaking, step three, 105-125. [ Links ]

Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Enabling single men and women enter into greatest marriages using predictive models of relationship triumph. Paper showed within 16th Yearly Conference of your own American Psychological People. [ Links ]

Means and you will system having determining those who are gonna enjoys a flourishing relationship

C). How does character count within the ination away from trait anxiety, negativity, and you can relationship satisfaction. Record out-of Identification and you will Personal Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Website links ]

Clark, Yards. S. (1985). Implications off matchmaking types of for wisdom compatibility. Within the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and incompatible dating (pp. 119-140). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]

Coombs, R. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in dating ambition and pleasure which have desktop-set-up lovers. Journal out-of ily, 28, 62-66. [ Links ]

Cooper, Good., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Relationship in cyberspace: Information on the internet appeal. Record out-of Sex Training and you can Medication, twenty-two, 7-fourteen. [ Links ]

Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Carry out individuals know what needed: The same or subservient spouse? Evolutionary Psychology, six, 595-602. [ Backlinks ]

Feingold, A great. (1988). Coordinating to possess attractiveness inside the close partners and you can same-sex friends: A beneficial meta-analysis and you may theoretic complaints. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Links ]

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Off popular with appalling: Disenchantment that have an enchanting spouse. Sociological Perspectives, forty-two, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]