step 1. Yet, inside the genealogy and family history, we knowthat for every laws there was a different. A vexing point ofgenealogy would be the fact not one person really understands how to utilize the conditions orrules having people definitive adjective such as for instance constantly, possibly, probably,more than likely, an such like. It will be fascinating if the indeed there other examples ofjointures being generated per year or one or two immediately following a well-known wedding big date.
2. Will there be an extant dispensation to your matrimony from ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh otherwise 4th cousins, shortly after taken from the newest fifth LordClifford? Who does narrow down its relationships day.
Arthur
Presumably, in the event the good dispensation is tried and you may provided, it would havebeen by one of several following the, that can are available in the new correspondingregister guide, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop regarding York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Whether your tenth Lord Clifford do wed during the early 1487 [say January] andhas E after in this year, really does the latest chronology not work?
John fingers?
Elizabeth born within the late 1487, Henry produced during the 1488/9, Joan during the ,etcetera. filling in the labels of your own post of . In the event that (a) thechronology however functions; and you will (b) their relationship bit wasn’t low; thenwe only have brand new 1505 pedigree out-of Henry VII’s that’s in the oppositionto the newest conjecture you to definitely she is a valid daughter.
six. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Have there been other people? In that case,would not one echo defectively on this file because the a source?
Out-of kissbrides.com snap the site comparisons We have created from the c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith the new 1480-1500 Visitation of Northern pedigrees, being
Regarding the c.1505 Relations pedigrees, the fresh Clifford youngsters are perhaps not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but alternatively about St. John pedigree. Because I’mnot accustomed the newest St. John family members, following the ‘s the guidance asit looks regarding c.1505 pedigree, because obtained from the brand new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. blog post. The brand new phrasing during the quotations is exactly whilst seems inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Of my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out-of Somerset got three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she had “My Woman the King’s Mommy.” who’d “Brand new Queen.” whohad “Prince “Because of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, earliest spouse.” she had step three daus & dos sons:
An excellent. “Edith, wedded in order to Geoffrey Rod out-of Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married towards Woman Margaret, dau. regarding theDuke of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[another type of child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He’d five students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you will oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, married so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and you may sistren.” Which have issueindicated, but not entitled.C2. “E, married to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “E, wedded first for the Lord Zouche; immediately after for the LordScrope regarding Bolton.” Issue:D1. [because of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [of the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated however titled.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. off K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”
